I do not have enough time to organize a team or invite panelists to a roundtable discussion in APrIGF 2024. I have listed some interesting issues for anyone who wants to send proposals to APrIGF 2024 or anyone who wants to discuss these issues in any Internet Governance Forum (IGF). As an observer of the internet or digital technology policy and development, I raise my concerns about how the government regulates the internet technology of tech giant companies and how people enhance media literacy. 1. The Tech Giants may control our lives and be stronger than the government. Last year, Microsoft announced plans to invest 2.5 billion pound s in artificial intelligence infrastructure in the UK. Of course, The UK government welcomes the investment. Any government welcomes foreign enterprises' investment in emerging technology, especially in cyber(AI or internet)security, talent education, semiconductors, or other technology infrastructures. At the same time, the UK Competition Marke
為甚麼要送給 Lomography 沖洗呢?
回覆刪除請介紹好又方便實際的沖洗商店吧!
回覆刪除我是覺得這些顏色都處理得不錯。除了『街頭』這一張的地上怎會出現毛屑在地上,還有另一張則有灰塵。除此之外,沖洗和掃的結果都蠻好的。只是好奇妳為甚麼會挑這一家沖呢?:p
回覆刪除只是因為方便且效果不差而已。
回覆刪除有時候是自己不會拍,拍不好,照片不好看不能怪人家。
其實妳送的這一家真的不差了。沒有刮片,沒有色彩平衡問題,也不看出是掃瞄軟體校正色彩平衡,所以似乎不錯的樣子。
回覆刪除也許妳可以試試看 『全彩』,可以參考這人拍的:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/taipeieyes/6204610512/
這人拍的底片應該都是全彩處理的。
也順便給妳看看我拍的,自己沖洗及掃瞄的結果:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/eyesarawak/tags/jobocpa/
但我覺得較喜歡 lomography 的掃瞄結果,有一種渾沌的感覺。全彩掃瞄的顏色間似乎較獨立突出。
謝謝你的分享:)
回覆刪除您的照片和另位的照片看起來都很銳利,很漂亮。
120底片是在LomoLab沖掃,因為我只要寄去就好了。我想你說的矇矓感,可能是因為相機古老加上感光不足的關係吧!從以下兩張照片看起來,所謂的矇矓感大概是這樣:
http://goo.gl/0xSNh
http://goo.gl/7UDE0
其他的相片是請鄰居開的沖印店沖掃,我會說是我不會拍,不然那麼好的相機,怎麼會拍成那副樣子XD
我把它看成是如此的差異:
回覆刪除http://kienhock.blogspot.com/2008/12/result-of-epson-v750.html
總之,可以試著送 『全彩』 處理看看。